Hi,

Not necessary. It is much simpler to start it in the background with '&'. If
kannel doesn't support this, you can very easily make a simple shell
wrapper, that calls from within the large executable in the background.

But I thought, thanks to our resident lawyer Falco, that we can start using
HTTP again!

BR,
Nikos

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi
>
> I had a similar problem with long php scripts updating several databases.
>
> What I finally do is split the php script in 2 parts a way that I can
> respond back to kannel ASAP so kannel can continue with next message
> and then. I did this storing data in a temporary table and then launch
> the 2nd part of the script with a cron picking up the info from temp
> table and finish the process.
>
> Regarding the patent thing... In the US that kind of stuff is "legal".
> I worked some time ago for Glenayre Electronics who was suid by RIMM
> (BlackBerry) regarding the the way we used to send 2way paging
> messages between users and to the internet using smtp... well, we lost
> the claim !!!
>
>
> Hope Helps
>
> Alvaro
>
>
>
>
> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
> celular y Nextel
> en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
> SMS y GPRS online
>              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET <http://www.perusms.net/>
> www.smsglobal.com.mx y
> www.pravcom.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 07:40, Falko Ziemann wrote:
> >> Does the Patent say anything about HTTPS? I mean HTTPS is not HTTP. And
> >> if the patent cover this to, why not simply route your traffic through a
> >> ssh-tunnel? You can setup this in seconds and "these guys" even helped
> >> you with their claim to secure your systems. Man, I should a patent this
> >> idea ;-)
> >
> > Too late.
> > Your post will be used against you as evidence of prior art :-)
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,  Milan
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to