Wow, be carefull. That was what I found in a blog.
I'm some 1,000 miles away from the US and so is my knowledge about the
US law-system. I can quite surley tell you, that these guys have no
chance in Germany ... but the US?! I read a story about a guy who sued
McDonalds because the coffee was too hot and he burned his mouth ...
successfully!!! A german judge would have sent this guy to an insane
asylum.
Regards
Falko
Am 13.02.2009 um 17:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi,
Not necessary. It is much simpler to start it in the background with
'&'. If kannel doesn't support this, you can very easily make a
simple shell wrapper, that calls from within the large executable in
the background.
But I thought, thanks to our resident lawyer Falco, that we can
start using HTTP again!
BR,
Nikos
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alv...@gmail.com
> wrote:
Hi
I had a similar problem with long php scripts updating several
databases.
What I finally do is split the php script in 2 parts a way that I can
respond back to kannel ASAP so kannel can continue with next message
and then. I did this storing data in a temporary table and then launch
the 2nd part of the script with a cron picking up the info from temp
table and finish the process.
Regarding the patent thing... In the US that kind of stuff is "legal".
I worked some time ago for Glenayre Electronics who was suid by RIMM
(BlackBerry) regarding the the way we used to send 2way paging
messages between users and to the internet using smtp... well, we lost
the claim !!!
Hope Helps
Alvaro
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 07:40, Falko Ziemann wrote:
>> Does the Patent say anything about HTTPS? I mean HTTPS is not
HTTP. And
>> if the patent cover this to, why not simply route your traffic
through a
>> ssh-tunnel? You can setup this in seconds and "these guys" even
helped
>> you with their claim to secure your systems. Man, I should a
patent this
>> idea ;-)
>
> Too late.
> Your post will be used against you as evidence of prior art :-)
>
> --
> Kind regards, Milan
>
>
