Do you still set the dlr-mask? ----- Original Message ----- From: Elton Hoxha To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: Falko Ziemann ; kannel users Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Omitting the generation of delivery reports
The access.log doesnt provide the smsc unique ID if i dont set the dlr-url 2009-03-17 07:43:26 Sent SMS [SMSC:D] [SVC:bulk1] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:1001] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:-1] [msg:11:helloworld!] [udh:0:] FID is empty! With dlr-url set it is like that 2009-03-11 09:33:30 Sent SMS [SMSC:internal1] [SVC:a] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:236981864111] [from:elton] [to:355672509006] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:31] [msg:11:helloworld!] [udh:0:] 2009/3/17 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> Actually not. You get it in access logs. Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Elton Hoxha To: Falko Ziemann Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:42 AM Subject: Re: Omitting the generation of delivery reports What about the message ID that comes from SMSC??? If DLR-URL is not set I`m losing that value too. Regards Elton On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Falko Ziemann <[email protected]> wrote: Simply not set the DLR-MASK and DLR-URL then kannel will not request any DLR. That's the only chance. Regards Falko Am 17.03.2009 um 08:29 schrieb Elton Hoxha: Hi, My issue doesnt concern kannel to ask SMSC for DLR. It is to tell SMSC not to generate status report in the database. With DLR-MASK whatever its value is, the SMSC will generate it, but KANNEL will decide whether will retrieve it or not. I`m using BULK SMS sending hundreed of thousands SMS and IT is exhausting for SMSC to generate this amount of reports. Thanks Elton 2009/3/17 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> Hi, Actually not. This is the part where kannel decides to ask SMSc for DLRs or not. It is not the part where it decides which DLRs to forward to the dlr_url, as suggested by Falco. BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Elton Hoxha To: Falko Ziemann Cc: kannel users Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 2:47 PM Subject: Re: Omitting the generation of delivery reports Hi, Did you mean this? if (DLR_IS_SUCCESS_OR_FAIL(msg->sms.dlr_mask)) 00918 pdu->u.submit_sm.registered_delivery = 1; Inside the SMPP_PDU *msg_to_pdu function In we change this kannel should be recompiled again.....is there any other way? Regards Elton On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Falko Ziemann <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, this is a protocol issue. SMPP for example has only the switch "registered_delivery" where you can (de-)activate all DLRs. It is not possible to activate on some kinds of DLR. Kannel has no control about this. But kannel should not forward certain DLRs to the DLR-URL if you're not interessted in them. Regards Falko Am 15.03.2009 um 17:52 schrieb Elton Hoxha: Hi all, I know this subject has been asked a lot, but my concern is something else. I have played with dlr-mask pretty much and it is working very well. In some cases I dont want to exhaust the database of SMSC creating useless delivery statuses for bulk SMS. Making my dlr-mask=10 didnt change anything. It is supposed that this value concerns only to submit and failure. This is what I need, only the acknowledment that sms has been submitted. But the SMSC is creating the delivery status as well, pending in the queue and making retries. Why the mask is behaving the same with different values? Thanks Elton
