It stands to reason that each different smsc protocol uses different values. However, it would be elegant for a kannel unified wrapper that converts everything to the respective values, vis-a-vis dlr mechanism. BTW the value I quoted is from the driver source code, not at the configuration entry point.
However this is just academic since priority doesn't seem to be implemented with CIMD2, and just a hint for whoever decides to add support. BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Alejandro Guerrieri To: Gabor Maros Cc: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:55 PM Subject: Re: Kannel priority in 1.4.3 On SMPP is 0-3, being 0 the lower priority. Don't know on other drivers, maybe it's different? Regards, Alex On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Gabor Maros <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, Just one additional thing. You mentioned that priority is 1-9. I've red again the documentation and it says priority on http interface must be 0-3 (kannel_userguide.pdf Table 6-16.). I may wrong or it is a new feature... Bye, Gabor Gabor Maros wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks, that means we have to developed it if we want to use it like that. > If it is done I will try to send the code to the community. > > Bye, > Gabor > > > Nikos Balkanas wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I do see some preliminary support for priority in the cimd2 driver, but I >> don't see doing anything with it. BTW priority is 1-9. >> >> BR, >> Nikos >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Gabor Maros" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:56 PM >> Subject: Kannel priority in 1.4.3 >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Kannel-priority-in-1.4.3-tp27438661p27544314.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
