I just tend to equate HTTP with overhead when it comes to things like this where a large volume of small messages will each need to have their own http server created and destroyed. Guess I must be one of the few that have asked this question :)
Alvaro Cornejo wrote: > > Why would you want to avoid http entirely? Kannels http server is very > efficient and lets you forget about the details of sms protocol. I > don't think there is such command. You should go inside bearerbox code > and look for a way to develop your own. > > > > > |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier > celular y Nextel > en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via > SMS y GPRS online > Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y > www.pravcom.com > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:31 AM, fegul <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That would still require Kannel to create an HTTP server and perform a >> GET. >> I'm just looking to avoid HTTP entirely. Is there an executable included >> with kannel that will accept SMS attributes like receiver number and >> message >> content as commandline arguments? >> >> >> Alvaro Cornejo wrote: >>> >>> You can use >>> >>> lynx commad to call the sendsms from the command line. >>> >>> something like: >>> >>> # lynx -dump >>> "http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=user&password=pass&from=%2B525541444188&to=2877&text=testmessage"; >>> >>> including all needed parameters in the url to call >>> >>> Hope helps >>> >>> Alvaro >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| >>> Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier >>> celular y Nextel >>> en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via >>> SMS y GPRS online >>> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y >>> www.pravcom.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, fegul <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Actually I think I may have answered my own question regarding looping >>>> the >>>> SMS back, there's a section in the documentation about MT to MO >>>> Direction >>>> Switching. >>>> >>>> I'm still wondering about sending SMS via commandline rather than HTTP >>>> if >>>> anyone has any answers. >>>> >>>> -F >>>> >>>> >>>> fegul wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So far I've been sending SMS from Kannel using the HTTP client but now >>>>> I'm >>>>> looking to receive SMS but I don't have a phone connected to the >>>>> server >>>>> so >>>>> I'm looking to test it internally. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way to create a message in fakesmsc and route it back to >>>>> itself >>>>> as though it were receiving it from someone else? (loop it back) >>>>> >>>>> Also, is there any way to send SMS via commandline arguments? (not >>>>> using >>>>> fakesmsc) I feel that having to create an HTTP server, send the HTTP >>>>> request, and destroy the server is rather wasteful when it comes to >>>>> resources. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://old.nabble.com/Testing-incoming-SMS-with-fakesmsc-%28and-sending-sms-via-commandline%29-tp28400558p28400685.html >>>> Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Testing-incoming-SMS-with-fakesmsc-%28and-sending-sms-via-commandline%29-tp28400558p28402882.html >> Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Testing-incoming-SMS-with-fakesmsc-%28and-sending-sms-via-commandline%29-tp28400558p28403407.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
