check the docs for "priority"
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM, T.K.Thapa <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com>wrote: > What exactly i am trying to achieve here is, our SMPP provider has provided > us 5 msg per second throughput and i have two users. First user is > submitting sms directly into sqlbox database (sqlbox is connected to > bearerbox) and second user is submitting sms via cgi url (smsbox directly > connected to same bearerbox). Messages of second user are very critical so > if first user (sqlbox) submit large/huge sms into sqlbox then also sqlbox > should not send sms to bearerbox more then 5 msg per second although if > first user sends sms in-between then, first user sms should pass immediately > before sqlbox submitted messages. > > I also want to know if messages submitted by sqlbox are high in quantity > then can we somehow tweak sqlbox to submit sms to bearerbox between 9 A.M. > to 7 P.M. (or any timing configurable) > > Please suggest. > > Regards > Tapan Thapa > > > --- On *Mon, 21/6/10, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl>* wrote: > > > From: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> > Subject: RE: Scheduling Question > To: "'Nikos Balkanas'" <nbalka...@gmail.com>, "'sangprabv'" < > sangpr...@gmail.com>, "'T.K.Thapa'" <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com> > Cc: "'Kannel list'" <users@kannel.org> > Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 7:40 PM > > > That's correct. It depends on what you want to achieve. > If you don't want to the queue to be too large because you are getting > throttling errors. Then the throughput directive of group = smsc is the > item > to use. > See documentation. > > == Rene > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikos Balkanas > [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=nbalka...@gmail.com>] > > Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 15:34 > To: Rene Kluwen; 'sangprabv'; 'T.K.Thapa' > Cc: 'Kannel list' > Subject: Re: Scheduling Question > > Not only that. It will also limit bandwidth on each smsc traffic, according > > to your agreements/specifications. I believe that the SMPP driver supports > it now correctly. By all means, use it, if you are getting a lot of > throttling errors in your logs and your SMSc will allow only a certain > amount of SMS/s. After all, that is what it was created for. Don't be > concerned about your queue. It will not get any larger if you already get > throttling errors. > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rene Kluwen > To: 'sangprabv' ; 'T.K.Thapa' > Cc: 'Kannel list' > Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:04 PM > Subject: RE: Scheduling Question > > > Throughput is for smsc trotteling. > The bearerbox queue will only get larger if you use this. > > == Rene > > From: > users-boun...@kannel.org<http://mc/compose?to=users-boun...@kannel.org>[mailto: > users-boun...@kannel.org <http://mc/compose?to=users-boun...@kannel.org>] > On Behalf > Of sangprabv > Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 9:50 > To: T.K.Thapa > Cc: Kannel list > Subject: Re: Scheduling Question > > it's in the smsc group, check it out. > > > > sangprabv > sangpr...@gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com> > > > > > On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:26 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote: > > > > Where i need to configure throughput directive? > > Do i need to configure in bearerbox or sqlbox? > > if i am configuring in bearerbox then it will only limit bearerbox to > submit > > at defined rate to smsc. it will not limit sqlbox to submit at defined rate > > to bearerbox. > > Regards > Tapan Thapa > > --- On Mon, 21/6/10, sangprabv > <sangpr...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > From: sangprabv <sangpr...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com> > > > Subject: Re: Scheduling Question > To: "T.K.Thapa" > <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com> > > > Cc: "Rene Kluwen" > <rene.klu...@chimit.nl<http://mc/compose?to=rene.klu...@chimit.nl>>, > "Kannel list" <users@kannel.org <http://mc/compose?to=us...@kannel.org>> > Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 10:41 AM > You can use throughput directive. > > > sangprabv > sangpr...@gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com> > > > > > On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:02 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Two more questions: > > 1. Can sqlbox submit sms to bearerbox at a configurable rate? Lets say 5 > message per second so that no queue is built at bearerbox for particular > smsc. > 2. If there is a queue at bearerbox (particular smsc), lets say 100 then > till the time queue come down to less than 100, sqlbox do not push further > messages to that particular smsc. > > Regards > Tapan Thapa > > --- On Mon, 21/6/10, T.K.Thapa > <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com>> > wrote: > > From: T.K.Thapa > <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com> > > > Subject: RE: Scheduling Question > To: "Rene Kluwen" > <rene.klu...@chimit.nl<http://mc/compose?to=rene.klu...@chimit.nl> > > > Cc: "Kannel list" <users@kannel.org<http://mc/compose?to=us...@kannel.org> > > > Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 9:37 AM > Hello, > > I have seen the same feature requested by many users. Can't we have the > same > > by default in source code of sqlbox and put the query in configuration > file. > > Regards > Tapan Thapa > > --- On Sun, 20/6/10, Rene Kluwen > <rene.klu...@chimit.nl<http://mc/compose?to=rene.klu...@chimit.nl>> > wrote: > > From: Rene Kluwen > <rene.klu...@chimit.nl<http://mc/compose?to=rene.klu...@chimit.nl> > > > Subject: RE: Scheduling Question > To: "'sangprabv'" > <sangpr...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com>>, > "'T.K.Thapa'" > <tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=tapan_thapa2...@yahoo.com> > > > Cc: users@kannel.org <http://mc/compose?to=us...@kannel.org> > Date: Sunday, 20 June, 2010, 11:11 PM > Yes, sqlbox does scheduling of writing with a simple (1-line) patch. > > You can find it on the mailinglist, but to facilitate your search, here it > is again: > > in gw/sqlbox_mysql.h > something like: > SELECT sql_id, momt, sender, receiver, udhdata, \ > msgdata, time, smsc_id, service, account, id, sms_type, mclass, mwi, > coding, > > \ > compress, validity, deferred, dlr_mask, dlr_url, pid, alt_dcs, rpi, \ > charset, boxc_id, binfo, meta_data FROM %S WHERE time < > UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW()) LIMIT 0,1" > > == Rene > > From: > users-boun...@kannel.org<http://mc/compose?to=users-boun...@kannel.org>[mailto: > users-boun...@kannel.org <http://mc/compose?to=users-boun...@kannel.org>] > On Behalf > Of sangprabv > Sent: zondag 20 juni 2010 16:04 > To: T.K.Thapa > Cc: users@kannel.org <http://mc/compose?to=us...@kannel.org> > Subject: Re: Scheduling Question > > Quick and dirty way is patch the query in the sqlbox source code. > > > > sangprabv > sangpr...@gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=sangpr...@gmail.com> > > > > On Jun 20, 2010, at 4:15 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote: > > Hello, > > Does kannel bearerbox,smsbox or sqlbox support scheduling of messages? If > yes how? > > Regards > Tapan Thapa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Juan Nin 3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands http://www.3cinteractive.com
