Maybe you can doit with sqlbox???

If I do remember well, sqlbox has an option where you can configure how many
messages get per loop it sends to bb. You can connect 2 sqlboxes each with a
different number of messages per loop/query....

??

Regards

Alvaro

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y
GPRS online
             Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com


On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote:

>  A more complex solution would be:
>
>
>
> 2 sms groups that connect to the localhost http service (or smppbox)… Each
> with a different throughput. This box further relays to your provider in one
> session.
>
>
>
> == Rene
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *T.K.Thapa
> *Sent:* donderdag 24 juni 2010 17:45
> *To:* Nikos Balkanas
>
> *Cc:* Kannel list
> *Subject:* Re: Scheduling Question
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Nikos but my provider is not ready to provide me two
> sessions. Can we have something else here.
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
> --- On *Thu, 24/6/10, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Scheduling Question
> To: "T.K.Thapa" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "'Kannel list'" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, 24 June, 2010, 9:58 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> You could also define 2 smsc groups, with different smsc-ids, all to the
> same smsc. Assign throughput 3 to the 1 & 2 to the other. Then put
> preferred-smsc-id to 1 itself and allowed-smsc-id to 2 itself. Send sqlbox
> traffic to the 1(3) and important traffic (I assume less) to the 2. This way
> you will have guaranteed reserved 2 SMS/s always for important traffic, and
> if it fills up you could send it over smsc 1 as well.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: T.K.Thapa
> To: 'Nikos Balkanas' ; 'sangprabv' ; Rene Kluwen
> Cc: 'Kannel list'
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 5:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Scheduling Question
>
>
> What exactly i am trying to achieve here is, our SMPP provider has provided
> us 5 msg per second throughput and i have two users. First user is
> submitting sms directly into sqlbox database (sqlbox is connected to
> bearerbox) and second user is submitting sms via cgi url (smsbox directly
> connected to same bearerbox). Messages of second user are very critical so
> if first user (sqlbox) submit large/huge sms into sqlbox then also sqlbox
> should not send sms to bearerbox more then 5 msg per second although if
> first user sends sms in-between then, first user sms should pass immediately
> before sqlbox submitted messages.
>
> I also want to know if messages submitted by sqlbox are high in quantity
> then can we somehow tweak sqlbox to submit sms to bearerbox between 9 A.M.
> to 7 P.M. (or any timing configurable)
>
> Please suggest.
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
> --- On Mon, 21/6/10, Rene Kluwen 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Rene Kluwen 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Subject: RE: Scheduling Question
> To: "'Nikos Balkanas'" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>,
> "'sangprabv'" <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>,
> "'T.K.Thapa'" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Cc: "'Kannel list'" <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 7:40 PM
>
>
> That's correct. It depends on what you want to achieve.
> If you don't want to the queue to be too large because you are getting
> throttling errors. Then the throughput directive of group = smsc is the
> item
> to use.
> See documentation.
>
> == Rene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikos Balkanas 
> [mailto:[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> ]
> Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 15:34
> To: Rene Kluwen; 'sangprabv'; 'T.K.Thapa'
> Cc: 'Kannel list'
> Subject: Re: Scheduling Question
>
> Not only that. It will also limit bandwidth on each smsc traffic, according
> to your agreements/specifications. I believe that the SMPP driver supports
> it now correctly. By all means, use it, if you are getting a lot of
> throttling errors in your logs and your SMSc will allow only a certain
> amount of SMS/s. After all, that is what it was created for. Don't be
> concerned about your queue. It will not get any larger if you already get
> throttling errors.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Rene Kluwen
> To: 'sangprabv' ; 'T.K.Thapa'
> Cc: 'Kannel list'
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:04 PM
> Subject: RE: Scheduling Question
>
>
> Throughput is for smsc trotteling.
> The bearerbox queue will only get larger if you use this.
>
> == Rene
>
> From: 
> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>[mailto:
> [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>]
> On Behalf
> Of sangprabv
> Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 9:50
> To: T.K.Thapa
> Cc: Kannel list
> Subject: Re: Scheduling Question
>
> it's in the smsc group, check it out.
>
>
>
> sangprabv
> [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:26 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote:
>
>
>
> Where i need to configure throughput directive?
>
> Do i need to configure in bearerbox or sqlbox?
>
> if i am configuring in bearerbox then it will only limit bearerbox to
> submit
>
> at defined rate to smsc. it will not limit sqlbox to submit at defined rate
> to bearerbox.
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
> --- On Mon, 21/6/10, sangprabv 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> From: sangprabv <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Subject: Re: Scheduling Question
> To: "T.K.Thapa" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Cc: "Rene Kluwen" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>,
> "Kannel list" <[email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>>
> Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 10:41 AM
> You can use throughput directive.
>
>
> sangprabv
> [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:02 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Two more questions:
>
> 1. Can sqlbox submit sms to bearerbox at a configurable rate? Lets say 5
> message per second so that no queue is built at bearerbox for particular
> smsc.
> 2. If there is a queue at bearerbox (particular smsc), lets say 100 then
> till the time queue come down to less than 100, sqlbox do not push further
> messages to that particular smsc.
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
> --- On Mon, 21/6/10, T.K.Thapa 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> From: T.K.Thapa 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Subject: RE: Scheduling Question
> To: "Rene Kluwen" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Cc: "Kannel list" <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Date: Monday, 21 June, 2010, 9:37 AM
> Hello,
>
> I have seen the same feature requested by many users. Can't we have the
> same
>
> by default in source code of sqlbox and put the query in configuration
> file.
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
> --- On Sun, 20/6/10, Rene Kluwen 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Rene Kluwen 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Subject: RE: Scheduling Question
> To: "'sangprabv'" 
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>,
> "'T.K.Thapa'"
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >
> Cc: [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, 20 June, 2010, 11:11 PM
> Yes, sqlbox does scheduling of writing with a simple (1-line) patch.
>
> You can find it on the mailinglist, but to facilitate your search, here it
> is again:
>
> in gw/sqlbox_mysql.h
> something like:
> SELECT sql_id, momt, sender, receiver, udhdata, \
> msgdata, time, smsc_id, service, account, id, sms_type, mclass, mwi,
> coding,
>
> \
> compress, validity, deferred, dlr_mask, dlr_url, pid, alt_dcs, rpi, \
> charset, boxc_id, binfo, meta_data FROM %S WHERE time <
> UNIX_TIMESTAMP(NOW()) LIMIT 0,1"
>
> == Rene
>
> From: 
> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>[mailto:
> [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>]
> On Behalf
> Of sangprabv
> Sent: zondag 20 juni 2010 16:04
> To: T.K.Thapa
> Cc: [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Scheduling Question
>
> Quick and dirty way is patch the query in the sqlbox source code.
>
>
>
> sangprabv
> [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]>
>
>
>
> On Jun 20, 2010, at 4:15 PM, T.K.Thapa wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does kannel bearerbox,smsbox or sqlbox support scheduling of messages? If
> yes how?
>
> Regards
> Tapan Thapa
>
>
>

Reply via email to