it might work until theres some problem (lets say both smscs went down, or sending slower than expected...) - sqlbox will keep sending same speed, and then once the smscs come back online i'll start hitting throttling error.. same thing asif i would set up another bb with the two links non-limited and smppbox/smsc_http between them - the box that does throttling doesnt know whats the real status
Regards, Konstantin On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>wrote: > You might want to use sqlbox for that: > > - Adjust sqlbox to bb throughput to the total allowed by your > operator, (patch to sqlbox might be needed... Alex?) > - Configure allow/denied/preferred as needed on each smsc > - Do not add throtling per smsc > - Let kannel do the loadbalancing by itself. It will send mts to the > available smsc. > > Didn't try it but should work... try, come back and share results ;-) > > Hope helps > > Alvaro > > > |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier > celular y Nextel > en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via > SMS y GPRS online > Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y > www.pravcom.com > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, sadly there's no way to overcome that, kannel can only limit per smsc > > connection. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alex > > > > BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]> > > Sender: [email protected] > > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:11:05 +0300 > > To: Kannel Users<[email protected]> > > Subject: throughput per smsc group? > > Hi all, > > We have some operator providing us with one user account and one > throughput > > limitation, but allowing to connect simultaneously to several server with > > the same account > > On their side, the throughput is that of combined traffic we create > > But as we need to limit the amount we send out via each smsc separately, > > this means each of the connections has 1/Nth of the total throughput (in > > this specific case - half). > > This is all nice - until one of the remote servers goes down (either for > > scheduled maintenance or as a result of a failure). When this happens we > > lose a portion of our allowed speed just because of the configuration on > our > > side. > > Is there a way to set throughput for a group of connections rather than > each > > single one of them? > > Regards, > > Konstantin > > > > >
