It is only an idea of how you would workarround your need.

If no workarround is found in/by the community, then try to patch
kannel/bb to your needs

I have my own "trottling" parsing the admin interface of kannel.
Before sending messages to kannel I look at the destination smsc queue
 and based on a 5 min time frame I do feed my messages to it.

Hope Helps

Alvaro



|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]> wrote:
> it might work until theres some problem (lets say both smscs went down, or
> sending slower than expected...) - sqlbox will keep sending same speed, and
> then once the smscs come back online i'll start hitting throttling error..
> same thing asif i would set up another bb with the two links non-limited and
> smppbox/smsc_http between them - the box that does  throttling doesnt
> know whats the real status
> Regards,
>   Konstantin
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> You might want to use sqlbox for that:
>>
>> - Adjust sqlbox to bb throughput to the total allowed by your
>> operator, (patch to sqlbox might be needed... Alex?)
>> - Configure allow/denied/preferred as needed on each smsc
>> - Do not add throtling per smsc
>> - Let kannel do the loadbalancing by itself. It will send mts to the
>> available smsc.
>>
>> Didn't try it but should work... try, come back and share results ;-)
>>
>> Hope helps
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>>
>> |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>> Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>> celular y Nextel
>> en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
>> SMS y GPRS online
>>              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>> www.pravcom.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > No, sadly there's no way to overcome that, kannel can only limit per
>> > smsc
>> > connection.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Alex
>> >
>> > BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]>
>> > Sender: [email protected]
>> > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:11:05 +0300
>> > To: Kannel Users<[email protected]>
>> > Subject: throughput per smsc group?
>> > Hi all,
>> > We have some operator providing us with one user account and one
>> > throughput
>> > limitation, but allowing to connect simultaneously to several server
>> > with
>> > the same account
>> > On their side, the throughput is that of combined traffic we create
>> > But as we need to limit the amount we send out via each smsc separately,
>> > this means each of the connections has 1/Nth of the total throughput (in
>> > this specific case - half).
>> > This is all nice - until one of the remote servers goes down (either for
>> > scheduled maintenance or as a result of a failure). When this happens we
>> > lose a portion of our allowed speed just because of the configuration on
>> > our
>> > side.
>> > Is there a way to set throughput for a group of connections rather than
>> > each
>> > single one of them?
>> > Regards,
>> >   Konstantin
>> >
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to