But this is not good because if we already have thousands of messages in our 
queue then how can is it possible to deliver new incoming message before queued 
messages. I think it is duty of Kannel to take care of message sequence in the 
same way as it take care of messages with different priority. Can anyone 
suggest 
the solution to solve this problem? I want that Kannel work like FIFO queue. 

Also tell me if we use sms.time field of message then can we solve this 
problem? 
because arrival time of messages having same priority will different. so we can 
differentiate them with there time.


________________________________
From: Alejandro Guerrieri <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]>
Cc: adil nazir <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 7:26:12 PM
Subject: Re: Problem of messages with same priority

Yes, and despite Kannel honors order of arrival at first, if messages are 
queued 
and retried is hard to tell what the final order would be, specially if a bind 
or the whole service is restarted.

Regards,

Alex


On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Note that is your sms provider/operator smsc who finally takes care of
>messages. If Kannel send messages in 1,2,3 order to the smsc it
>doesn't mean they will arrive in that order to your phone.
>
>
>|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
>celular y Nextel
>en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
>SMS y GPRS online
>              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
>www.pravcom.com
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:11 AM, adil nazir <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I have tested kannel with messages having same priorities these messages
>> should be treated like FIFO method means which message comes first should be
>> reached first on particular smsc but kannel is treated all messages, having
>> same priorities, equal  and deliver them randomly even there arrival time is
>> different why? Can anyone help me in this regard? Any solutions please?
>>
>>
>
>



      

Reply via email to