Yeah! it works now! thanks very much Rene Didac
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: > Use a simple group = smsc for both TX and RX sessions. Like this: > > > > group = smsc > > smsc = smpp > > smsc-id = <your-id> > > port = 2346 > > receive-port = 2346 > > …. > > etc. > > > > == Rene > > > > *From:* Dídac Royo [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, 07 March, 2011 18:56 > > *To:* Rene Kluwen > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: OpenSMPPbox does support sepatate TX and RX conenctions (or > only tranceiver mode is supported) ? > > > > I'm trying to configure Kannel(client) and openSMPPbox with separate RX and > TX but now I'm having problems wih the DLR's.. > > Although It works fine for me in transceiver mode, but I need to reproduce > an issue and provide support to a smpp client which requires separate TX and > RX). > > > > This is the Kannel-client configuration: > > > > group = smsc > smsc = smpp > smsc-id = TXsmsc > port = 2346 > receive-port = 0 > *# ...and other parameters which works fine with opensmppbox in > transceiver mode...* > > group = smsc > smsc = smpp > smsc-id = RXsmsc > port = 0 > receive-port = 2346 > *# ...and other parameters which works fine with opensmppbox in > transceiver mode...* > > With this setup, the status page http://server:13000/status shows both the > TX and RX connections, but, when I submit a test SMS, this what happens: > > 1. the TX connection shows: "sent:1 " and "dlr: 1" > > 2. and nothing in the RX connection: "sent:0" and "dlr:0" > > 3. the kannel-server status-page shows that there is another DLR in queue, > which is not received by the kannel-client, and the kannel-server log it > shows this error: *2011-03-07 16:52:13 [31712] [9] ERROR: SMPP: Unknown > TLV `dlr_err', don't send.* > > (note: In transceiver mode both the DLR's are being received correctly by > the kannel-client) > > > > In separate TX and RX connections I would expect this in the kannel-client > status page: > > 1. the TX connection shows: "sent:1 " and "dlr: 0" > > 2. and nothing in the RX connection: "sent:0" and "dlr:2" > > > > Any idea why TX is receiving 1 DLR even with receive-port = 0? > > Any idea why the 2nd DLR is not reaching the RX connection? > > > > Thanks again for your help! > > > > Didac > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Dídac Royo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now I understand how it works. Thanks Rene > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Separate tx and rx connections cannot be configured independently. They > share the same settings (e.g. port number, credentials, etc.)… > > > > == Rene > > > > *From:* Dídac Royo [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, 05 March, 2011 10:09 > *To:* Rene Kluwen > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: OpenSMPPbox does support sepatate TX and RX conenctions (or > only tranceiver mode is supported) ? > > > > Hi, > > Thanks René for your quick answer. > > I've read this guide: http://www.chimit.nl/kannel/userguide.pdf > and searched around, but I couldn't find how to configure separate TX and > RX... > > Can you please explain how to configure OpenSMPPbox with separate TX and > RX? > I only know how to connet smppclients to opensmppbox in transceiver mode. > > Thanks > > Dídac > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: > > The short answer: Yes, it supports separate TX and RX connections. > > > > == Rene > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Dídac Royo > *Sent:* Friday, 04 March, 2011 18:34 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* OpenSMPPbox does support sepatate TX and RX conenctions (or > only tranceiver mode is supported) ? > > > > Hi All, > > Does OpenSMPPbox support sepatate TX and RX conenctions? > or only tranceiver mode is supported ? > > Thanks for your help! > > Dídac > > > > > > >
