Paulo, you are talking about Stipe's smppbox, right? Mark, are you having an issue with opensmppbox?
== Rene From: Paulo Correia [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vrijdag 5 juli 2013 0:18 To: Mark Poulsen Cc: Rene Kluwen; [email protected] Subject: Re: SMPPBox and the validity period when submiting short message Hi Mark, Good luck with it! Let us know what you find out. Best regards, Paulo Correia Em 04-07-2013 07:35, Mark Poulsen escreveu: Hi Paulo, I'd just thought I'd confirm the same issue. We're seeing that bearerbox receives the wrong validity_period from SMPPbox when it's set by the ESME. We're trying to rollback to earlier versions of both SMPPbox and Kannel, but so far without success. I'll let you know if we come to a solution. Best regards, Mark On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paulo Correia <[email protected]> wrote: I tried Rene, indeed I tried ... Em 29-06-2013 13:47, Rene Kluwen escreveu: For smppbox related questions, contact Stipe Tolj. From: users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paulo Correia Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2013 23:52 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMPPBox and the validity period when submiting short message Hi, Just adding some info, when looking at the smsc_http.c of kannel 1.5 (the one in use) I see, on the kannel_send_sms function (the one used for system-type=kannel): ... if (sms->sms.validity != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED) octstr_format_append(url, "&validity=%ld", (sms->sms.validity - time(NULL)) / 60); if (sms->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED) octstr_format_append(url, "&deferred=%ld", (sms->sms.deferred - time(NULL)) / 60); ... So, can it be a limitation on the smppbox routing to the http smsc? Or am I missing something? Best regards, Paulo Correia Em 13-06-2013 16:47, Paulo Correia escreveu: Hi, We've been using smppbox in the last two years and routing messages to an HTTP SMSC, with the following configs: * SMPPBOX: group = smppbox admin-port = XXXXX admin-password = XXXX status-password = XXXX bearerbox-host = "localhost" bearerbox-dcs = utf-8 smppbox-port = XXXX system-id = "skysmssmpp" log-file = "/home/smsuser/logs/smppbox_smppbox.log" log-level = 0 access-log = "/home/smsuser/logs/smppbox_smpp_access.log" store-type = spool store-location = "/home/smsuser/data/spool/smppbox" transparent-mo-routing = yes transparent-mo-routing-account = yes time-to-keep-status = 604800 * SMSC: group = smsc smsc = http smsc-id = smppsmsc smsc-username = xxxxxxxxxxx smsc-password = xxxxxxxxxxx system-type = kannel send-url = http://localhost:zzzzz/smppsmsc port = yyyy connect-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1;..." no-sender = false no-coding = false no-sep = true allowed-smsc-id = smppsmsc reroute-dlr = true dlr-url = http://localhost:yyyy/?username=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://localhost:yyyy/?username=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&password=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> &password=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx We do get all submit_sm from the ESMEs and deliver all MOs and DLRs, but if an ESME sends a submit_sm with a validity_period, we do not see it reflected on the URL <http://localhost:zzzzz/smppsmsc> http://localhost:zzzzz/smppsmsc ... Does anyone have the same problem, even in OpenSMPPBox? Best regards, Paulo Correia -- Mark Poulsen // +47 4117 5035 // www.veoo.com <http://www.veoo.com/> Chief Technical Officer Veoo.com, 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London. WC2H 9JQ
