Likewise with me.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Paulo Correia <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi Rene,
>
> Yes, I'm using Stipe's smppbox, but was wondering if the same problem
> occurs in opensmppbox.
>
> Best regards,
> Paulo Correia
>
>
> On 10-07-2013 14:28, Rene Kluwen wrote:
>
>  Paulo, you are talking about Stipe’s smppbox, right?****
>
> Mark, are you having an issue with opensmppbox?****
>
> ** **
>
> == Rene****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Paulo Correia 
> [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>
> *Sent:* vrijdag 5 juli 2013 0:18
> *To:* Mark Poulsen
> *Cc:* Rene Kluwen; [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: SMPPBox and the validity period when submiting short
> message****
>
>  ** **
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Good luck with it! Let us know what you find out.
>
> Best regards,
> Paulo Correia
>
> Em 04-07-2013 07:35, Mark Poulsen escreveu:****
>
>  Hi Paulo,
>
> I'd just thought I'd confirm the same issue. We're seeing that bearerbox
> receives the wrong validity_period from SMPPbox when it's set by the ESME.
>
> We're trying to rollback to earlier versions of both SMPPbox and Kannel,
> but so far without success.
>
> I'll let you know if we come to a solution.
>
> Best regards, ****
>
>
> Mark****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paulo Correia <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I tried Rene, indeed I tried ...
>
> Em 29-06-2013 13:47, Rene Kluwen escreveu:****
>
>  For smppbox related questions, contact Stipe Tolj.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* users [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *On Behalf Of *Paulo Correia****
>
>
> *Sent:* donderdag 13 juni 2013 23:52****
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: SMPPBox and the validity period when submiting short
> message****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi, ****
>
>
> Just adding some info, when looking at the smsc_http.c of kannel 1.5 (the
> one in use) I see, on the kannel_send_sms function (the one used for
> system-type=kannel):
> ...
>     if (sms->sms.validity != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED)
>         octstr_format_append(url, "&validity=%ld", (sms->sms.validity -
> time(NULL)) / 60);
>     if (sms->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED)
>         octstr_format_append(url, "&deferred=%ld", (sms->sms.deferred -
> time(NULL)) / 60);
> ...
>
> So, can it be a limitation on the smppbox routing to the http smsc? Or am
> I missing something?
>
> Best regards,
> Paulo Correia
>
> Em 13-06-2013 16:47, Paulo Correia escreveu:****
>
> Hi,
>
> We've been using smppbox in the last two years and routing messages to an
> HTTP SMSC, with the following configs:****
>
>    - SMPPBOX:
>    group = smppbox
>    admin-port = XXXXX
>    admin-password = XXXX
>    status-password = XXXX
>    bearerbox-host = "localhost"
>    bearerbox-dcs = utf-8
>    smppbox-port = XXXX
>    system-id = "skysmssmpp"
>    log-file = "/home/smsuser/logs/smppbox_smppbox.log"
>    log-level = 0
>    access-log = "/home/smsuser/logs/smppbox_smpp_access.log"
>    store-type = spool
>    store-location = "/home/smsuser/data/spool/smppbox"
>    transparent-mo-routing = yes
>    transparent-mo-routing-account = yes
>    time-to-keep-status = 604800****
>    - SMSC:
>    group = smsc
>    smsc = http
>    smsc-id = smppsmsc
>    smsc-username = xxxxxxxxxxx
>    smsc-password = xxxxxxxxxxx
>    system-type = kannel
>    send-url = http://localhost:zzzzz/smppsmsc
>    port = yyyy
>    connect-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1;..."
>    no-sender = false
>    no-coding = false
>    no-sep = true
>    allowed-smsc-id = smppsmsc
>    reroute-dlr = true
>    dlr-url =
>    http://localhost:yyyy/?username=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&password=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    ****
>
> We do get all submit_sm from the ESMEs and deliver all MOs and DLRs, but
> if an ESME sends a submit_sm with a validity_period, we do not see it
> reflected on the URL http://localhost:zzzzz/smppsmsc ...
> Does anyone have the same problem, even in OpenSMPPBox?
>
> Best regards,
> Paulo Correia****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Mark Poulsen // +47 4117 5035 // www.veoo.com
> Chief Technical Officer
> Veoo.com, 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London. WC2H 9JQ ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
>
>


-- 
Mark Poulsen // +47 4117 5035 // www.veoo.com
Chief Technical Officer
Veoo.com, 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London. WC2H 9JQ

**

**

Reply via email to