2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn <[email protected]> > Thanks for the response. In my scenario, we want to be able to send as > fast as possible. We are regularly submitting MTs at a rate of 200 / > second. We get DLRs at a rate of 1.5 - 2 times this (300 - 400 / second). > This makes sense to me since we get multiple DLRs for every MT (status > 8,4,1). We do need the DLRs for reporting purposes. Our architecture was > just not setup to process them at the rate we are receiving them. >
That sounds like you've got HUGE amounts of traffic. DLR for 8 status is not received by remote, but it's kannel who reports that message was submitted. That's why if you set 31 mask you get 2 DLRs per 1 MT. > > The apache server that hosts our dlr.php says it is receiving requests at > a rate of 30 / second. The kannel status page says we are receiving DLRs > at a rate of 300 / second. I cannot figure out where the bottleneck is. The > apache status page shows idle worker threads. So I do not think that is the > bottleneck. Is smsbox not sending to our dlr url as fast as it is receiving > them from the smsc? > Get rid of apache, install nginx + php-fpm and tune them properly. Also it might be database bottleneck. Try submitting MTs with internal storage and without any dlr.php scripts and see how it goes. > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:57 AM, spameden <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You can control DLR via dlr_mask parameter, if its unset you won't >> receive any DLRs. >> >> About speed - it's strange for me that speed of DLRs is much higher than >> MT submit speed. >> >> Don't think there is any algorhythm implemented to control inbound >> information coming, you might turn into transmitter mode, thus it should >> stop receiving DLRs. >> >> >> 2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn <[email protected]> >> >>> It looks like setting receive-port=0 has no effect on DLRs. Is there any >>> way to control which binds receive DLRs or to somehow control how fast they >>> are received? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Thorn <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> If we are getting DRs faster than we can process them, I assume if we >>>> reduce the number of receive binds the rate that we get DRs would go down. >>>> Is this generally true? >>>> >>>> We have a total of 10 binds setup - the desired design is to have 6 >>>> transmit binds for sending MTs and 4 receive binds for accepting MOs and >>>> Deliver Receipts. However, it appears that all 10 of our binds are >>>> receiving Delivery Receipts. The SMSC is reporting several "Windows on >>>> receiver links full" errors. I assume this is because they are sending DRs >>>> faster than we are able to process them. >>>> >>>> I tried setting receive-port = 0 on one of our transmit binds. However, >>>> we still seem to be receiving DRs on this bind. Here the config for this >>>> bind. Am I missing something? >>>> >>>> group = smsc >>>> smsc = smpp >>>> smsc-id = s-send-1 >>>> smsc-admin-id = send-1 >>>> throughput = 60 >>>> host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx >>>> port = 17800 >>>> receive-port = 0 >>>> smsc-username = "xxxxxxx" >>>> smsc-password = xxxxxxx >>>> system-type = "" >>>> address-range = "" >>>> source-addr-ton = 2 >>>> source-addr-npi = 1 >>>> dest-addr-ton = 2 >>>> dest-addr-npi = 1 >>>> enquire-link-interval = 30 >>>> msg-id-type = 0x03 >>>> >>>> I appreciate any help on this issue. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jeff Thorn <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Group, >>>>> We are receiving DLRs from the SMSC faster than we can process them. >>>>> Our setup is supposed to have 6 transmit binds and 4 receive binds. >>>>> However, I just looked at status page showing all our binds and it looks >>>>> like all 10 of our binds are receiving DLRs and they are coming in at a >>>>> rate greater than 250 / second. >>>>> >>>>> If I set the "receive-port" setting to 0 on our transmit binds, will I >>>>> stop receiving DLRs on these binds? >>>>> >>>>> If this reduces the number of binds that can receive DLRs, should the >>>>> rate they are received go down? Or is that totally dependent upon the >>>>> SMSC? >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything I can control in my config that would reduce the >>>>> rate they are received or is that something only the SMSC can control? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Jeff Thorn > Principal Software Architect > Thorn Technologies, LLC > (410) 429-0255 > www.thorntech.com > @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thorntech> | > LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffthorn> | > Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/thorntechnologies> >
