Let me setup like that one smsc account on two kannel for MT load balancing.
I will share the outcome. @Alex, we try to keep minimum sms queue on each kannel. This helps to minimize the sms stuck on queue. Also kannel has recent support with redis. I will test if that will help sharing queue on both kannels. lets see. -- regards, abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445 On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri < [email protected]> wrote: > We use an approach like that and works fine. However, queues are local to > each box, so if a box goes down queued messages are stuck there until the > box gets back up. Queues are also not balanced, so if you have a million > messages on one box an zero on the other there's no way to balance that. > > Regards > -- > Alex Guerrieri > > On Jan 23, 2014, at 13:57, "Rene Kluwen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > What happens if you configure both Kannel 1 & Kannel 2 with the same smsc > configurations? > > > > *From:* users [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Abdul Basit > *Sent:* donderdag 23 januari 2014 19:43 > *To:* users > *Subject:* SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic > > > > Dear all, > > I am looking for SMPP load balancing solution for MT traffic. > > Kannel 1 > / > > SMSC ==> Load Balancer (smpp proxy) ==> > > \ > Kannel 2 > > > > Problem is that my smsc operator cannot load balance SMPP traffic to my 2 > kannel gateways. How can i load balance this traffic? > > Suggestions required. > > > -- > regards, > > > abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445 > >
