If you bind two sessions for single SMPP account, one session on each
box you will get MO messages in round-robin fashion.
Regards,
Ghulam Mustafa
On 01/29/2014 03:48 AM, Abdul Basit wrote:
Let me setup like that one smsc account on two kannel for MT load
balancing.
I will share the outcome.
@Alex, we try to keep minimum sms queue on each kannel. This helps to
minimize the sms stuck on queue.
Also kannel has recent support with redis. I will test if that will
help sharing queue on both kannels. lets see.
--
regards,
abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
We use an approach like that and works fine. However, queues are
local to each box, so if a box goes down queued messages are stuck
there until the box gets back up. Queues are also not balanced, so
if you have a million messages on one box an zero on the other
there's no way to balance that.
Regards
--
Alex Guerrieri
On Jan 23, 2014, at 13:57, "Rene Kluwen" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What happens if you configure both Kannel 1 & Kannel 2 with the
same smsc configurations?
*From:*users [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*Abdul Basit
*Sent:* donderdag 23 januari 2014 19:43
*To:* users
*Subject:* SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic
Dear all,
I am looking for SMPP load balancing solution for MT traffic.
Kannel 1
/
SMSC ==> Load Balancer (smpp proxy) ==>
\
Kannel 2
Problem is that my smsc operator cannot load balance SMPP traffic
to my 2 kannel gateways. How can i load balance this traffic?
Suggestions required.
--
regards,
abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 <tel:%2B92%2032%201416%204196>
| o: +92 30 0841 1445 <tel:%2B92%2030%200841%201445>
