Hi all,

I just wanted to let you know that I have made some modifications and
additions to the base API proposal and created a reference implementation
for the Linode DNS as a service (http://www.linode.com/api/dns).

- Base DNS API -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/base.py?revision=1173564&view=markup
- DNS Types -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/types.py?revision=1173565&view=markup
- Linode driver -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/drivers/linode.py?revision=1174437&view=markup
- Linode driver tests -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/test/dns/test_linode.py?revision=1174439&view=markup

Keep in mind that the Linode driver isn't totally finished yet. I still need
to refactor some of the internals, but the public facing API itself
shouldn't change. I also need to finish the tests, there a few still
missing.

Everyone is welcome (and encouraged!) to play with it, test it and provide
their feedback here.

Thanks,
Tomaz

2011/9/11 Tomaž Muraus <to...@apache.org>

> OK, cool, I have updated the proposal:
>
> - Rename Host to Record
> - Add get_zone() and get_record() method
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/libcloud/DNS%20API%20proposal?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Mike Nerone <m...@nerone.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Russell Haering
>> <russellhaer...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > 2011/9/11 Tomaž Muraus <to...@apache.org>:
>> > > I'm not totally sure about "Host", better generic name would probably
>> be
>> > > "Record". Opinions?
>> >
>> > +1 for "Record".
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, there are plenty of DNS record types that aren't hosts at all.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to