OK, now we also have a Zerigo DNS driver - https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/drivers/zerigo.py?view=markup .
During this time I have also made some minor changes and fixes to the base DNS API. I was thinking about releasing a 0.6.0 beta / preview version in the upcoming week. This way other people can play with it, test it and hopefully provide some valuable feedback before the final 0.6.0 release. Thanks, Tomaz 2011/9/23 Tomaž Muraus <to...@apache.org> > Hi all, > > I just wanted to let you know that I have made some modifications and > additions to the base API proposal and created a reference implementation > for the Linode DNS as a service (http://www.linode.com/api/dns). > > - Base DNS API - > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/base.py?revision=1173564&view=markup > - DNS Types - > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/types.py?revision=1173565&view=markup > - Linode driver - > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/libcloud/dns/drivers/linode.py?revision=1174437&view=markup > - Linode driver tests - > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/libcloud/trunk/test/dns/test_linode.py?revision=1174439&view=markup > > Keep in mind that the Linode driver isn't totally finished yet. I still > need to refactor some of the internals, but the public facing API itself > shouldn't change. I also need to finish the tests, there a few still > missing. > > Everyone is welcome (and encouraged!) to play with it, test it and provide > their feedback here. > > Thanks, > Tomaz > > 2011/9/11 Tomaž Muraus <to...@apache.org> > >> OK, cool, I have updated the proposal: >> >> - Rename Host to Record >> - Add get_zone() and get_record() method >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/libcloud/DNS%20API%20proposal?action=diff&rev2=2&rev1=1 >> >> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Mike Nerone <m...@nerone.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Russell Haering >>> <russellhaer...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>> > 2011/9/11 Tomaž Muraus <to...@apache.org>: >>> > > I'm not totally sure about "Host", better generic name would probably >>> be >>> > > "Record". Opinions? >>> > >>> > +1 for "Record". >>> > >>> >>> Yeah, there are plenty of DNS record types that aren't hosts at all. >>> >> >> >
