Hi Albert, all
I have read in section 5 'LISP Mobile Node Operation' of the the latest LISP-MN
internet draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-meyer-lisp-mn-12#page-7) as
follows:"Note that one subtle difference between standard ITR behavior and
LISP-MN is that the LISP-MN encapsulates all non-local, non-LISP site destined
outgoing packets to a PETR.".
But I can see on wireshark capture that the MN sends packets to the destination
non-LISP node without the tunnels. Is this some form of optimisation, or a bug
in the program?
Regards, Musab Isah
Research Student,School of Computing and Communications,D29, InfoLab21Lancaster
University
