Hi Musab,
Do you have a proxy-etr configured in your mobile node? If the
destination is non lisp, the only reason to send it natively is that no
proxy-etr is configured in LISPmon.
Best regards
Albert
On 08/04/15 18:26, MUSAB MUHAMMAD wrote:
Hi Albert,
I am using version 0.4.1.
Regards,
Musab Isah
Research Student,
School of Computing and Communications,
D29, InfoLab21
Lancaster University
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 9:37 AM, Albert López <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Musab,
Sorry for the delay. Could you tell me which version of LISPmob are
you using? 0.4.1 or experimental?
Regards
Albert
On 04/04/15 19:26, MUSAB MUHAMMAD wrote:
Hi Albert, all
I have read in section 5 'LISP Mobile Node Operation' of the the
latest LISP-MN internet draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-meyer-lisp-mn-12#page-7) as follows:
"*Note that one subtle difference between standard ITR*
* behavior and LISP-MN is that the LISP-MN encapsulates all non-local,*
*non-LISP site destined outgoing packets to a PETR.*".
But I can see on wireshark capture that the MN sends packets to the
destination non-LISP node without the tunnels. Is this some form of
optimisation, or a bug in the program?
Regards,
Musab Isah
Research Student,
School of Computing and Communications,
D29, InfoLab21
Lancaster University
