I have now verified that the SNMP problem I reported is solved using the patch.

But, do we have to rebuild everything (including test applications) with this 
patch applied?

Regards,
Hans

Betham R-G19443 wrote:
> Hans,
> 
>>From the given below limited logs, 32 is not SPND SVC ID. The mentioned
> svc_id is MDS specific SVC ID (ps. see in mds_papi.h).
> As you mentioned these logs are from unpatched 1.0-4 OpenSAF, SVC ID 32
> is MBCSv MDS SVC ID.
> 
>>From the logs it is very clear that AVD-MBCSv sync send is timed out.
> Active AVD lost its presence in the cluster. 
> 
> I recommend to apply the patch as the unpatched one may be inconsistent
> with those applications referring OpenSAF SVC IDs/MDS SVC IDs/Table IDs
> as a hard coded values. Unpatched OpenSAF has backward compatibility
> issues.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ramesh.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 7:34 PM
>> To: Betham R-G19443
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Users] snmp problems with 1.0-4
>>
>> Do you recommend to apply and use this patch i.e. could it 
>> cause other more severe problems than the ones I described?
>>
>> E.g. I see this in SCAP logs for a 1.0-4 (unpatched) system:
>>
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV: Timeout or Error occured
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV: Timeout occured on red sndrsp 
>> message from svc_id=32, to svc_id=32
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV: Adest=<0x00000000,1>
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV: Anchor=<0x0002010f,3059466104>
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV:No Route Found from SVC id = 32 to 
>> SVC id = 32 on ADEST <0x00000000, 1>
>>> MDS:ERR    |MDS_SND_RCV: RED send Message sent Failed from 
>> svc_id= 32, to svc_id=32
>>
>> SVC ID 32 is the removed SPND.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hans
>>
>> Betham R-G19443 wrote:
>>> Here it is (attached). 
>>>
>>> Thanx,
>>> Ramesh. 
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:18 PM
>>>> To: Betham R-G19443
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] snmp problems with 1.0-4
>>>>
>>>> Could you please send a proper patch file?
>>>>
>>>> Generated with 'diff -Naur', see man page for 'patch'.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>> Betham R-G19443 wrote:
>>>>> Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please apply the attached patch on top of OpenSAF 1.0-4 
>> release at 
>>>>> ../opensaf/.. directory.
>>>>> The changes made as part of SPSv cleanup in OpenSAF
>>>> triggered the said
>>>>> issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ramesh.
>>>>>   
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans Feldt
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 7:53 PM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: [Users] snmp problems with 1.0-4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can only get AMF and CLM MIBS to work. Other SAF
>>>> services does not
>>>>>> respond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any ideas what might be wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The log entries in ncsSnmpSubagt.log (see below) does not
>>>> look good
>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost amf 
>>>>>> SAF-AMF-MIB::saAmfAgentSpecVersion.0 = STRING:
>>>>>> SAI-AIS-AMF-B.01.01 SAF-AMF-MIB::saAmfAgentVendor.0 = STRING: 
>>>>>> NET-SNMP <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost safcluster 
>>>>>> SAF-CLUSTER-MIB::saClmAgentSpecVersion.0 = STRING:
>>>>>> SAI-AIS-CLM-B.01.01 SAF-CLUSTER-MIB::saClmAgentVendor.0 =
>>>>>> STRING: NET-SNMP <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost safEvt 
>>>>>> SAF-EVENT-SVC-MIB::safEvt = No Such Object available on
>>>> this agent at
>>>>>> this OID SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost aise 
>> | grep -i 
>>>>>> ckpt SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost aise | 
>> grep -i lck 
>>>>>> SC_2_2# snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost aise | grep -i
>>>> msg SC_2_2#
>>>>>> snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost aise | grep -i msg SC_2_2#
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# pgrep -fl snmp
>>>>>> 2151 /opt/opensaf/controller/bin/ncs_snmp_subagt ROLE=2
>>>> NID_SVC_ID=20
>>>>>> 5291 /usr/sbin/snmpd -x tcp:localhost:705 -I -interfaces -Lsd 
>>>>>> -p       \
>>>>>>  /var/run/snmpd.pid 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> 5308 /usr/sbin/snmptrapd -c /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf -t
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# cat /usr/share/snmp/ncsSnmpSubagt.conf
>>>>>> agentxsocket tcp:localhost:705
>>>>>> agentxPingInterval 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SC_2_2# more /var/log/ncsSnmpSubagt.log NCS SNMP SubAgt
>>>> 2.0 NET-SNMP
>>>>>> version 5.4.1 netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed
>>>>>> agent_registry.c:535
>>>>>> netsnmp_subtree_load()
>>>>>> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed
>>>>>> agent_registry.c:535
>>>>>> netsnmp_subtree_load()
>>>>>> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed
>>>>>> agent_registry.c:535
>>>>>> netsnmp_subtree_load()
>>>>>> Cannot find module (IP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot
>>>> find module
>>>>>> (IF-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (TCP-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (UDP-MIB): 
>>>>>> At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (HOST-RESOURCES-MIB): 
>>>>>> At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) Cannot find module (SNMPv2-SMI): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) Cannot find module (NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB): At line
>>>> 0 in (none)
>>>>>> Cannot find module (DISMAN-EVENT-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) Cannot find module (DISMAN-SCHEDULE-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) Cannot find module (UCD-SNMP-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>> (none) Cannot
>>>>>> find module (UCD-DEMO-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot 
>> find module
>>>>>> (SNMP-TARGET-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (SNMP-MPD-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB): At line 0 in (none) Cannot find module
>>>>>> (SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) Cannot find module (SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB): At line 0 in
>>>>>> (none) _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
>>>>>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users

Reply via email to