Sugadeesh, One question inline ...
> Hi Hans, > > In both node failover and SU failover the spec expects that > All the components in the SU whose component recommended the > failover are cleaned up. We wanted to make it a Little > softer for the components hence we do Your intention is good but as this behavior of AMF doesn't align with that of the specification should we open a CR or a bug to track this issue? Sayan > 1) Clean up of only the failed component. > 2) For all the other components in the SU, Quiesced and > remove in case of active CSI assignment/only remove in case > of standby CSI assignment. > 3) In the process of CSI quiesced/remove if any of the > component gives error if It can't handle it we then clean it up. > > This way we give a chance for the healthy components to deal > with the situation. > If they can't we will anyway clean them up as specified in the spec. > > Regards > Sugadeesh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saha > > Sayandeb-G19428 > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:31 PM > > To: Hans Feldt > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Users] AMF Node > > fail-over,SaAmfCSIRemoveCallbackT erroneously called? > > > > Hans, > > > > One correction to my earlier comment. I failed to notice the phrase > > "abrupt termination" in the description of the recovery > action and in > > such a case it will indeed be CLEANUP that needs to be > invoked on the > > components in the affected node as AMF shouldn't trust erroneous > > components to execute callbacks. This is probably a bug. > > > > Thanks > > Sayan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saha > > > Sayandeb-G19428 > > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:21 AM > > > To: Hans Feldt > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Users] AMF Node > > > fail-over,SaAmfCSIRemoveCallbackT erroneously called? > > > > > > Hans, > > > > > > One comment inline ... > > > > > > > When testing node fail-over, we have seen that > > > SaAmfCSIRemoveCallbackT > > > > is called for components. The fail-over is initiated from a > > > component > > > > calling saAmfComponentErrorReport with recommended recovery > > > FAIL_OVER. > > > > > > > > We expected the CLC-CLI CLEANUP command to be called > > directly since > > > > AMF B.01.01 > > > > states: > > > > > > I think your interpretation that there is no need to do a > > > SaAmfCSIRemoveCallbackT is correct in case of > SA_AMF_NODE_FAILOVER > > > recommended recovery. But I was under the impression that > > TERMINATE > > > in its various incarnations like callback, CLC-CLI etc. > > (based on the > > > type of the > > > components) would be invoked under such circumstances and > > not CLEANUP. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sayan > > > > > > > "This implies an abrupt termination of all local components and > > > > failing over all service instances assigned to all service > > > units on a > > > > node." > > > > > > > > Our opinion is that CSI remove should be used during SU > > > fail-over and > > > > Node switch-over. > > > > > > > > What is your opinion? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Hans > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email > > Security System. > > > For more information please visit > > > http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email > Security System. > > For more information please visit > > http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://list.opensaf.org/maillist/listinfo/users
