On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:32:49 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete!
This is a major misdesign of dnf. It hides some problems and tries to be helpful, but the confusion that causes can be highly problematic in cases such as yours. It is a known issue. DNF developers are aware of it. Is it the same when you run "dnf distro-sync"? What do you get for: dnf repoquery --unsatisfied dnf repoquery --duplicated > "dnf repolist" and try > repolist > Last metadata expiration check performed 2:13:06 ago on Wed Jul 29 11:16:10 > 2015. > repo id repo name > status > *fedora Fedora 22 - i386 > 37,654 > rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free > 418 > rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free - Updates > 18 > rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree > 161 > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree - Updates > 13 > *updates Fedora 22 - i386 - Updates > 6,203 > > Are the * OK? Yes. -- users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
