On 11/04/2015 01:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 4 November 2015 at 20:14, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com
<mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What kernel packages is this with? Do they verify fine?
core, tools, tools-libs, modules, modules-extra, headers and devel, all
4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
They all verify correctly, i.e. give only ......T.
Does "modprobe -v btrfs" print anything, or does the command fail
silently?
Gives no output. "lsmod|grep btrfs" shows nothing.
As root, try:
# find /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/fs -name "*btrfs*"
And see if you get anything like this:
[root@golem4 ~]# find /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/fs -name "*btrfs*"
/lib/modules/4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64/kernel/fs/btrfs
/lib/modules/4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64/kernel/fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.xz
In other words, do you actually have the btrfs module in your kernel
tree? (the "btrfs.ko.xz" bit is the actual module)
Is this with SELinux enforcing? If so, have you tried with enforcing=0
yet? (or run "setenforce 0" as root before trying modprobe and the other
commands.
I tried with enforcing off. No difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the -
- reader...who doesn't get it. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
