On 10/10/2016 02:16 PM, JD wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:31 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > > On 10/10/2016 11:52 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:42 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 16:35 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I said, I'm happy enough with suspend for now. My aim was to > > > > > reduce > > > > > power consumption at night (this isn't a server that has to > be on all > > > > > the time). > > > > > > > > I dont' think computers use that much power (least normal > workstations > > > > anyway) to bring up or down your utility bill much, so > couldn't you > > > > just leave it on as is and just shut off your monitor until > your ready > > > > to use it again? > > > > > > I used to do that up until about a year ago. Since then I think > I have > > > noticed a reduced utility bill, but of course that's not really > > > evidence as there are other factors, including lower rates > because of > > > the drop in oil prices. This is an i7 system with an Nvidia card, an > > > SSD, a 1TB SATA drive and 16TGB of RAM, so probably above > average for > > > home workstations in terms of power consumption. The monitor is > a 23- > > > inch HP LCD. > > > > Well, I dunno, 16 tera gigabytes of RAM (you said 16TGB) is a hell of > > a lot! I've never seen a mobo that could handle that. :-) Must > have the > > cooling system from hell in there! > > > > > > > > If there were an easy way to measure it I would :-) > > > > If you have a clamp-style AC ammeter, you can get a widget that you > > plug into your outlet and your system plugs into the widget. The > widget > > splits the hot line out separately. You put your ammeter around > that leg > > and measure the current. You can compute your usage using Ohm's law, > > e.g. if you measure 2A at 120V, that's 240 VA. If you want it in > watts, > > your average computer has a power factor of about .8, so that'd be 240 > > times .8 or 192 watts (or so). > > > > Just an idea. > > Well, apparently the savings might not offset the price of the ammeter, > but I suppose the advancement of knowledge always has a cost :-) > > poc > > > Well Patrick, I was wondering if there is a website > that identifies cards (chipsets) NOT supported by linux. > I see for example FBSD users not finding drivers for > Broadcom chipsets (perhaps only specific ones). > So, to help > > existing linux users and newbs, it seems > that such a website would go a long way to let people > know what are NOT supported, or partially supported > devices. It would also helps people shopping for a new > computer to avoid laptops that have unsupported chipsets.
There are a number of sites like that. Google "linux hardware compatibility". A good resource is http://www.linux-drivers.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital [email protected] - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - "I was contemplating the immortal words of Socrates when he said, - - 'I drank WHAT?'" -- Val Kilmer in "Real Genius" - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
