Now that the train of hail storms have shifted south, I can attention to this.

On 7/7/23 1:26 PM, Ron Flory wrote:
On 7/7/2023 12:42 PM, home user wrote:
When I try to verify a back-up, I use "diff -r".  The directory trees being compared contain about 
870 files (mostly binary, like PNG, JPG, and so on), and take up about 707 megabytes.  The trees being 
compared are on the hard drive and on a USB-3 stick.  When I run the "diff -r" command, it seems to 
finish too quickly - it seems like less than a half of a second.  I saw similar results a few weeks ago 
comparing about 30 gigabyte trees on the hard drive vs. on a USB-3.1 stick; the results were practically 
instantaneous.  Is diff actually checking every bit (or byte), or is it using some "short cut"?

  Was this immediately after your backup/copy completed?  You may be comparing 
against the in-memory disk caches.
  You may (simply) flush the in-memory disk caches to force reads from the 
external disk with (run as root or sudo):

       sync ; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

then try your diff again.


What?  Is "diff" cheating?!

Test #1
I did a back-up yesterday morning.
I've shut down at least 3 times since then.  So surely the cache has been 
cleared.
So here is a "diff -r":
-----
bash.1[~]: time diff -r .incbak_20230706/ /run/media/weilian.eng//USB\ 
DISK/.incbak_20230706/

real    0m19.238s
user    0m0.138s
sys     0m1.177s
bash.2[~]:
-----
19+ seconds.  So you may be correct.

Next I'll try a new back-up, run the diff, clear the cache, and do another 
diff.  I'll report back in several minutes.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to