On 5/17/26 9:05 PM, Fred wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2026 20:14:02 +0100
Barry Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

On 17 May 2026, at 16:58, Javier Perez <[email protected]> wrote:

Just adding my 2 cents.
Last time I did a clean setup was about two years ago and I have
been upgrading through dnf since then. oomd has not been included.

pepebuho@pepewin:~$ dnf list oomd
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Available packages
oomd.x86_64 0.5.0-15.fc43 fedora

I am using the XFCE distro

Please don't head-post

oomd is installed from systemd-udev and its required for any Fedora
system.

Barry
-----------------------------------------------------
I am posting this as a reply to Barry's message but it is just a
comment after reading this thread for several days. I have 2 fedora 43
systems that were new when fedora 41 was current and have been
upgraded. Neither of them have oom or oomd installed that I have found.

However, they do have choom in /usr/bin. There is also a man enty for
choom and also for systemd-oomd.service. I wonder if the functionality of oomd 
has been put
in choom?

This thread got confused a while back. "oomd" is something different. The default in Fedora is "systemd-oomd" which is provided by the "systemd-udev" package. "choom" is a way to adjust the "badness" score of processes to affect how the oom killer will treat them.

systemctl status systemd-oomd

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to