On 6/14/26 6:29 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
On this bug I posted
xfce4-screensaver idle/lock failure after xscreensaver removal
due to orphaned autostart desktop entries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488676
The closed won't fix response was:
"dnf remove" are not expected to touch user directory. It
can happen that user needs to do some "cleanup" manually.
Am I being "blown off" or is this actually the case? If not
the sue, why lease the system entries too? It feels
like a blow off.
I have no idea what the second line is supposed to say.
dnf does not touch user directories ever on install or remove.
I assume that xscreensaver itself sets up the autostart entry when it
runs. I don't see how that autostart entry would block another
screensaver when the program doesn't even exist.
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
