At 01:21 PM 6/16/2006, Jonathan Jacobs wrote (in part) >J. Merrill wrote: (in part) >> I don't know if C# allows overloads that are identical except for out-ness >> -- can you have both >> int Foo(string x, out int blah) >>and int Foo(string x, int blah) ??? > >Apparently you can.
If that's the case, then it's possible that the design of __overloads__ needs to be changed -- the current key defn of "tuple of types without indication of out-or-ref" may not be sufficient. Martin / Dino / Jim -- could one of you chime in on this? J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
