Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > >> I can understand why IP or JYthon uses the same type but then the >> results don't seem to be consistent with CPython. I might misunderstand >> something here. Alternatively I assume using 'is' implies such issues. > > you're confusing CPython implementation details with the language > specification. > Python makes very few guarantees about object identities; the specification > says > that there must be exactly one None object, and the type object for > two objects of > the same type is the same object (obviously), but that's about it.
I see. My bad then. I assume then that people like me will have to be careful between those small differences which are not entirely valid cases. Thanks for the heads up. - Sylvain _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
