On Feb 4, 2008 3:29 PM, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is rather ugly. :-)
Thanks; I thought so myself. > Would this technique have anything to offer for attributes on methods > and properties (etc). It's hard to see how, but it's been a while since I looked at that part of the source. I'm pretty sure that the CLR class itself needs to be emitted entirely by the contents of the one "class" statement -- and well before the first method is defined. Which means that none of the properties or methods of the class could influence codegen. Frankly, I don't think that attributes on methods or properties are realistic -- at least, not as part of the original class definition. What I think you'd be looking at is the ability to define a class wrapper that wraps the initially-defined dynamic class with a new statically-defined class that allows you to put attributes on methods and properties. Hmm... where have I heard that recently... :) -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
