On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:52:31 +0700, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So obviously one impractical solution is to pass the non-existent -X:MTA > option :). Another solution is to ensure that you pump messages. The > easiest way to do that in your sample code below is > Thread.CurrentThread.Join(100) instead of doing a Thread.Sleep(100). > The join will continue to pump messages while waiting for the current > thread to exit. That will time out of course because it's waiting on > its self so it'll behave just like a sleep. Yeah, that's work. Do not fully understand what you're talking about (I'm basically a database application developer) But I wish you luck on fixing it. :) As for 2.0b, I've found it break many of my application test-cases. Mostly, relate to CLR interop. But I'm yet to find way to extract and reproduce the bug without submitting my whole working set. Looking forward to see beta2 soon. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
