Jimmy Schementi wrote:
On 5/4/08 12:11 PM, "Michael Foord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, to quote a 'certain' blog entry:
"We wanted to get the new language bits to you quicker than Silverlight
releases."
:-)
This is definitely true post SLBeta2. My fault for not conveying that there
would be no interm release before SLBeta2. But by end of May we'll have a
release out that works with SLBeta2.
Ah well. There are exciting changes for Silverlight in IronPython that I
am eagerly awaiting...
At least this gives me a nice quote to prod you with post SLBeta2. ;-)
It was a great blog entry by the way: many thanks. Posting something
like that along with the new release, or shortly after, would have been
a good thing. As you say, often the 'why' matters.
Once it (SL) stabilizes we can then rev on top of it.
So yeah, post beta2 we'll come up with a way to rev the versions on top of
the current released version of SL.
Well - posting revisions as quickly as the IronRuby guys are pushing to
the Rubyforge repository would be fine. (Even revisions that haven't
gone through your whole test machinery - at least this way you could get
fast(er) community feedback on changes.) Ah well, I can dream...
Michael Foord
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
I should have a copy of VS 2008 arriving 'soon' and will give this a go.
Great =)
~js
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
