We're not going to do anything specific to support MDbg (or vice versa, as far as I know) -- but we shouldn't have to. IronPython emits the same kind of line number metadata that C# emits, so any managed debugger ought to be able to follow right along.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:16 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Congratulations on the release of IP2B4! > > I have a quick question with respect to IP2 and MDbg - will MDbg be updated > to > work with the DLR? I know there are a few issues using a debugger with > dynamic > languages, but not insurmountable as MDbg is a great base to work from > (thanks > to Mike Stall!) > > My point is that for folks that are implementing tooling around the DLR > (e.g. > consoles, IDE's, and possibly new dynamic languages), having a debugger > would > seem to be desirable... > > http://softwareindustrialization.com/WebbasedDLRIDEWithMDbgDebugger.aspx > > > Thanks, > > Mitch > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
