we are currently running it on 32 bit OSes only. Windows 2003 and XP. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Dave Fugate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, one of the things the IronPython test team does daily is run > a set of standardized benchmarks against the latest internal build of > IronPython. We're in the process of reevaluating the platforms we measure > these benchmarks on with the end goal of increasing the number of tests we > can run. For example, if we could cut x64 Vista from the list of platforms, > the x64 Vista machine(s) could be reimaged to run *new* benchmarks we > wouldn't have had the resources for before. Alternatively, we might reimage > the x64 Vista machine(s) as some other platform we don't currently test > under. Of course in such a scenario we'd still run other classifications of > tests under x64 Vista. > > > > I wanted to hear peoples' opinions on the importance of measuring > IronPython performance under x64 Windows OSes before we make any decisions > on this. First off, how many people out there are actually running > IronPython under a 64-bit OS? Would it be sufficient for us to report news > on IronPython performance in terms of 32-bit platforms? > > > > Thanks, > > > > The IronPython Team > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
