Sorry Jeff, you're right. I had started this a long time ago just as a fun thing to hack on every now and then and it's recently gotten good enough that it seems like it can make it into 2.6. So it's a bit of an oddball - even if we had a place for me to claim that I was working on it it's doubtful that I would have actually claimed it until about a week or two ago...
The good news is there's no other surprises like this lurking - we've generally been focused on 2.6, bugs, and startup perf - but ctypes is the #1 feature request so it seemed worthy of working on it. Maybe we should add a 2.6 Plan page to the CodePlex site? I'm sure there's more information than just what new features we expect to be included that could go there. > -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users- > boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 12:03 PM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: Re: [IronPython] pywin32 on Iron Python? > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Dino Viehland <di...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > Not to rain on Jeff's parade but I too have been working on a CTypes > > implementation. I'll probably check the initial version into 2.6 in > the > > next few days but there's still a lot more to go before it's a solid > > implementation. > > Geez, Dino, you guys need to do a better job of making this info > public. It's a bit frustrating not knowing what you guys are working > on. > > I think the IronRuby guys have a page listing all of the libraries > that need work and who's claimed them. They also allow for library > contributions, so it's a bit of a different story. > > - Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
