Jeff: Thank you for your kind suggestion to use bitbucket. I don't think that would be a good idea. I already have to keep up three distributions of adodbapi -- on pywin32 and FePy as well as its own project. A fourth would be a bit too much. I would prefer to include django capability in the trunk, if possible. -- Vernon
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Vernon Cole <vernondc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Markus: > > Would you be so kind as to zip up and email to me the adonet-dbapi as > you > > now have it patched? > > A better option IMO would be to create a fork on bitbucket and push > changes there. That way I can pull back into my existing repo. > > > I will create a version which does not error out. (May take a few days.) > > How much overlap is there between your other adodb project and > adonet-dbapi? I don't think there's any need to have two libraries > that do the same thing for IronPython, so we might as well figure out > what's different and work towards one library. > > - Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
