cool :-) On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Dino Viehland <di...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I didn’t even realize this is broken. Probably 2.6.2 at the earliest – > it looks like we had the test case which validates this disabled due to a > generic “needs to work on 2.6 bug”. > > > > I’ve opened this more specific bug: > http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=26499 > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > *From:* users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto: > users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] *On Behalf Of *Ronnie Maor > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:04 AM > *To:* Discussion of IronPython > *Subject:* [IronPython] abstract base classes > > > > This is probably something well known, but I just tried using ABCs in IPy > 2.6 for first time and saw that they don't enforce anything: > > > > from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod > > class A(object): > > __metaclass__ = ABCMeta > > > > @abstractmethod > > def foo(self, x): > > pass > > > > class B(A): pass # no foo method > > > > b = B() # shouldn't work, but does > > > > > > Do you know if/when this is planned to be fixed? > > > > thanks > > Ronnie > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
