Jeff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Dino Viehland <di...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > clr.LoadClrExtensions(namespace) > > I'd like to paint the bikeshed 'clr.ImportExtensions()', if possible, > and have it take either a namespace or a static class - i.e. > System.Linq or System.Linq.Enumerable. > > import clr, System > clr.ImportExtensions(System.Linq) > > Looks fine to me. > > For a shorter syntax, I would prefer > > from System.Linq.Enumerable import * > > and have it pull in any extension methods in that class. My only > concern is that it's a little too magical, and doesn't match the usual > behaviour of an import statement.
Ok, +1 on ImportExtensions for the name form me. There's also 1 limitation which occurs to me: We will only allow extension methods which don't clash on the base class to appear. So for example if you define: class MyClass : IEnumerable<object> { public void Where() { } } Then the extension Where won't be available. Unfortunately I think that's the only way we can really do this efficiently. Of course you'll still be able to call System.Linq.Enumerable.Where. Sound reasonable? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com