On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@novell.com> > wrote: > > Moving to Git seems like a no brainer to me: we only have to move > IronPython > > there. If we were to pick another of the open source source code > > management systems we would be moving both Ruby and Python away. > > Where I'm torn is that IronPython is between a rock and a hard place - > on the one hand, I want to work closely with the Mono project (which > would strongly imply using github), but I also want to be in sync with > the Python community (which has largely embraced hg). > > Python's separated stdlib will be a Mercurial repo, and if IronPython > were in Hg we could easily pull in the stdlib as a subrepo. However, I > presume the DLR will stay on github, and we'll need to pull that in as > well, which of course would be easier from git. > > Damned if we do, damned if we don't. I'm leaning towards Mercurial > because I prefer it, and it seems like many other people do as well. I > know hg can pull from git, but I don't know about the reverse. > > > If the concern is the UI for checking code out for Git, there is a > > transparent bridge that exposes the tree to Subversion which has good > > Windows clients. > > Tortoise-Git is actually very nice now. I don't think git's Windows > support is really an issue anymore. > > Haven't tried it, but this looks interesting: http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2010/10/10/dual-bitbucketgithub-citizenship/ - Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > -- Thanks, Noah
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
