Dear Inaki,
Thanks for the help..really appreciated...I guess I should add a ACK check
to loose route because as you said it's a new in dialog transaction...Please
chek below:
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
t_relay();
exit;
}
}
Regarding INFO and NOTIFY...I'll do that later after ACK is OK
What I did above is OK?
Regards
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote:
> El Domingo, 15 de Marzo de 2009, michel freiha escribió:
> > Here I defined the loose route to reply on the REINVITE message:
> >
> > if(loose_route()){
> > t_on_reply("7");
> > if (is_method("INVITE")) {
> > t_on_failure("1");
> > force_rtp_proxy();
> > t_relay();
> > exit();
> > }
> > }
>
> This is wrong. I already suggested you to compare your loose_route section
> with that in the Kamailio default config file, but it seems you haven't
> done
> it.
>
> I hope you know that ACK after INVITE-200 is a *new* transaction, and an
> in-dialog request (so it goes into loose_route section).
> Question: is your loose_route section allowing this ACK to be routed? I
> just
> see the t_relay for INVITE, what about other requests as INFO, PRACK,
> NOTIFY... *ACK* ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users@lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
