Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Martes, 17 de Marzo de 2009, Guillaume Lacroix escribió: >> Thanks for the quick answer and explanation Iñaki :) As you advised, I >> opened a feature request in the tracker and put in it the elements you >> mentionned. If anyone has yet a way to trick openSER to not forward 487 >> answer with no transaction attached, I would be glad to know it :) > > Thanks, hope we could find a solution for that.
Can't you check if a transaction exists and "drop" the reply in the reply route? If reply-routes can be used to modify replies (i.e. SDP and Contact fixups for NAT traversal), surely they can be used to suppress them as well? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
