El Martes, 17 de Marzo de 2009, Alex Balashov escribió: > Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > El Martes, 17 de Marzo de 2009, Guillaume Lacroix escribió: > >> Thanks for the quick answer and explanation Iñaki :) As you advised, I > >> opened a feature request in the tracker and put in it the elements you > >> mentionned. If anyone has yet a way to trick openSER to not forward 487 > >> answer with no transaction attached, I would be glad to know it :) > > > > Thanks, hope we could find a solution for that. > > Can't you check if a transaction exists and "drop" the reply in the > reply route?
Not so easy. I've never tryed the only way to process a *stateless* reply is in "onreply_route[0]". Theorically "check_trans()" works also in ONREPLY_ROUTE, but even if it detects the reply, how to drop it? do "drop()" or "exit()" eliminate a response? > If reply-routes can be used to modify replies (i.e. SDP and Contact > fixups for NAT traversal), surely they can be used to suppress them as > well? Sure? (I don't know). PD: I will try it right now :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
