El Miércoles, 3 de Febrero de 2010, bran...@cryy.com escribió: > I do see all the behavior as referenced, however the actual problem is > upon receipt of the invite to the UAC, in which it responds with 200 OK > and Contact of RFC1918 address, in which is not being fix natted contact > because at this point kamailio is not aware of the UAC being behind nat > due to the reinvite passing the nat uac test because we can not tell with > the invite coming downstream from PSTN, however can only tell upon receipt > of 200 ok back from client. > > Let me know if this all makes sense and if there is something I am still > missing.
I don't get still what you mean. With the approach I told in my previos message communication is possible for all the re-INVITE's (coming from the PSTN or from the UA behind NAT). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
