Thanks,
george.
ddt.patch
Description: Binary data
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:42 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
The problem was found and fixed. Until the patch get applied to the 1.1 and 1.2 branches please use the attached patch.Thanks for you help for discovering and fixing this bug, george. <ddt.patch> On Oct 4, 2006, at 5:32 PM, George Bosilca wrote:That's just amazing. We pass all the trapezoidal tests but we fail the general ones (rectangular matrix) if the leading dimension of the matrix on the destination processor is greater than the leading dimension on the sender. At least now I narrow down the place where the error occur ... george. On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:41 PM, George Bosilca wrote:OK, that was my 5 minutes hall of shame. Setting the verbosity level in bt.dat to 6 give me enough information to know exactly the data- type share. Now, I know how to fix things ... george. On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:35 PM, George Bosilca wrote:I'm working on this bug. As far as I see the patch from the bug 365do not help us here. However, on my 64 bits machines (not Opteron but G5) I don't get the segfault. Anyway, I get the bad data transmissionfor test #1 and #51. So far my main problem is that I cannotreproduce these errors with any other data-type tests [and believe mewe have a bunch of them]. The only one who fails is the BLACS. I wonder what the data-type looks like for the failing tests. Someonehere knows how to extract the BLACS data-type (for test #1 and #51) ?Or how to force BLACS to print the data-type information for each test (M, N and so on) ? Thanks, george. On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Michael Kluskens wrote:On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:22 AM, Harald Forbert wrote:The TRANSCOMM setting that we are using here and that I think is the correct one is "-DUseMpi2" since OpenMPI implements the corresponding mpi2 calls. You need a recent version of BLACS for this setting to be available (1.1 with patch 3 should be fine). Together with the patch to openmpi1.1.1 from ticket 356 we are passing the blacs testerfor 4 processors. I didn't have to time to test with other numbersthough.Unfortunately this did not solve the problems I'm seeing, could be that my system is 64 bits (another person seeing problems on an Opteron system).New tests of BLACS 1.1p3 vs. OpenMPI (1.1.1, 1.1.2rc1, 1.3a1r11962)with Intel ifort 9.0.32 and g95 (Sep 27 2006). System: Debian Linux 3.1r3 on dual-opteron, gcc 3.3.5, all tests with 4 processors 1) patched OpenMPI 1.1.1 and 1.1.2rc1 using the two lines from Ticket 356. 2) set TRANSCOMM = -DUseMpi2 Intel ifort 9.0.32 tests (INTFACE=-DAdd): OpenMPI 1.1.1 (patched) & OpenMPI 1.1.2rc1 (patched):In the xCbtest both generated errors until Integer Sum tests thenno more errors) OpenMPI 1.3a1r11962: no errors until crash: COMPLEX AMX TESTS: BEGIN. Signal:11 info.si_errno:0(Success) si_code:1(SEGV_MAPERR) Failing at addr:0xe62000 [0] func:/opt/intel9.1/openmpi/1.3/lib/libopal.so.0 (opal_backtrace_print+0x1f) [0x2a95aa8c1f] *** End of error message *** Signal:11 info.si_errno:0(Success) si_code:1(SEGV_MAPERR) Failing at addr:0xbc0000 [0] func:/opt/intel9.1/openmpi/1.3/lib/libopal.so.0 (opal_backtrace_print+0x1f) [0x2a95aa8c1f] *** End of error message *** g95 (Sep 27 2006) tests (INTFACE=-Df77IsF2C): OpenMPI 1.1.1 (patched) & OpenMPI 1.1.2rc1 (patched):In the xCbtest both generated errors until Integer Sum tests thenno more errors) OpenMPI 1.3a1r11962: no errors until crash: COMPLEX SUM TESTS: BEGIN. COMPLEX SUM TESTS: 1152 TESTS; 864 PASSED, 288 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED. Signal:11 info.si_errno:0(Success) si_code:1(SEGV_MAPERR) Failing at addr:0xb6f000[0] func:/opt/g95/openmpi/1.3/lib/libopal.so.0 (opal_backtrace_print+0x1f) [0x2a95aa7c1f] *** End of error message *** COMPLEX AMX TESTS: BEGIN. Signal:11 info.si_errno:0(Success) si_code:1(SEGV_MAPERR) Failing at addr:0xe27000[0] func:/opt/g95/openmpi/1.3/lib/libopal.so.0 (opal_backtrace_print+0x1f) [0x2a95aa7c1f] *** End of error message *** 3 additional processes aborted (not shown) Michael _______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users_______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users_______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users_______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users_______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
