"Robert A. Schmied" <[email protected]> writes: > with respect to a 'respin' i'm thinking the changed configure option for the > existing package is either a) deleting the -no-qt3support as the default is > -qt3support or b) explicitly adding -qt3support. > > whether this will be a trivial respin without headache is doubtful, as there > must have been a valid reason to override the -qt3support default. in > addition > there will probably be a bit of additional gar configuration needed to package > up the Qt3Support library, include files and anything else that implement > the qt3 support stuff.
I'm not the initial maintainer of thess packages and I do not know the reason behind having inhibited the qt3 support capability. Nothing is trivial in building such a massive package set as Qt but I'll try to see if it's not a low hanging fruit and a respin will make it fall. -- Peter
