Robert,
Could you expand on what you mean by:
1. Privacy
2. Extra security
These seem to be highly abused terms while there is no proper
description available of what they mean and for whom they provide the
benefit.
Adrian
On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Robert Dyck wrote:
I see a need for a very basic proxy-like B2BUA. This would
completely hide the
local topology. This would provide privacy and extra security as
well as
working around the bad behaviour of some service providers.
Rob
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
For what it's worth, I've had problems doing this with some [broken]
carriers. Namely they see a private address in one of the Vias and
they assume it's NAT.. Pretty messy. If you look through the archive
you'll see what happened to me.
That being said, I think it's pretty unusual that this happens.
-Brett
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Giuseppe Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi.
I have an opensips server running "between" a man local area and
internet. This mean that UAC comes from local area and gateways
are on
internet.
The local interface (eth0) ip is not reachable from internet.
Opensips server can traverse the nat using add_local_rport(), can
mediaproxy do the same ?
Regards.
--
Giuseppe Roberti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
