Nice addresses!! (rolling eyes) I guess they just thought they'd start re-numbering the internet starting at 1.0.0.0. Brilliant!
Well if it's routable it shouldn't matter. I thought you were going to say that you had conflicting addresses in the RFC1918 space (ie: a customer with a 192.168.15.20 address and a media gateway also on the same address on the other side of the network). Other than that, even if they are goofy addresses, it shouldn't matter as long as it's properly routable. As for RTP and SIP.. You'll be telling the carriers to send RTP to your external IP and signal to your external IP.. So I don't think you'll have a problem. I'm curious why you say mediaproxy can't do it. -Brett On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Giuseppe Roberti <[email protected]> wrote: > My problem is that we have a lot of customer using provider called > fastweb, on italy, that is the biggest nat i have ever seen :) > This provider use optical fiber on internal MAN, at least in Milan, so > that everybody in this MAN is a natted client. > Because of fast internal network my customer tell me to put a media > relay server that "bridge" the rtp traffic from the MAN to the carriers > but i have problem on doing it with mediaproxy. > I know that rtpproxy can do it, so i'm looking why mediaproxy seems not. > > I hope i am explained me clean. > > P.S. Note that the ip address of the clients on MAN are not from RFC1918 > private address; it look like 1.0.0.0/9 for Milan Optical Fiber, > 2.0.0.0/8 for Milan Hinterland, etc.. > > Brett Nemeroff wrote: >> For what it's worth, I've had problems doing this with some [broken] >> carriers. Namely they see a private address in one of the Vias and >> they assume it's NAT.. Pretty messy. If you look through the archive >> you'll see what happened to me. >> >> That being said, I think it's pretty unusual that this happens. >> -Brett >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Giuseppe Roberti <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I have an opensips server running "between" a man local area and >>> internet. This mean that UAC comes from local area and gateways are on >>> internet. >>> The local interface (eth0) ip is not reachable from internet. >>> Opensips server can traverse the nat using add_local_rport(), can >>> mediaproxy do the same ? >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> -- >>> Giuseppe Roberti >>> <[email protected]> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> > > > -- > Giuseppe Roberti > <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
