On Tuesday 04 August 2009 13:03:02 Jeff Pyle wrote: > Raul, perhaps I can explain from the perspective of someone who may benefit > from such misplaced features.
> "Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Or, perhaps in these cases, in the > eye of the implementer. If topology hiding is the only B2BUA-style feature > I need and all my other requirements are satisfied by a proxy like > Opensips, why would I re-engineer my whole system on a different platform? Maybe because "hidding" module of OpenSIPS is based on a broken dialog module ? ... that's a good reason for me. > The good news is many if not all of these features have an "off" switch for > the uninterested parties to throw. It's not often that everyone wins. I know, maybe someday in a near (or not so near) future, I could use some of that fancy features, by now I prefer to have a SIP-Proxy+Registrar+Presence on Kamailio (sorry I don't use OpenSIPS) and B2BUA features on Callweaver GW's -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
