++ Alex Balashov wrote: > If we are going to have a cultured and dignified relationship between > the Kamailio and OpenSIPS camps, which I assume is the goal of everyone > for reasons of commercial self-preservation if nothing else, then the > provocations need to stop from both sides. > > No, it is not very upstanding to come on the OpenSIPS list only to > remind its members that you don't use OpenSIPS and that Kamailio is much > better. Whether you think it's true or not, the OpenSIPS list is not > the appropriate forum in which to air that thought; it's just not polite. > > The values and focus of every community must be respected, and this > mailing list belongs to the OpenSIPS community and development team. > There's a certain degree of "when in Rome..." that should be obeyed. > > I'm a very committed Debian user, and intensely dislike Redhat-derived > distributions. But if I am on a mailing list centered chiefly around > Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, etc. or products based on them, it's just not my > place to bring up Debian or invite an RH vs. Debian flame war. That's > just not what the list is for, and my ability to join it and ask a > question is a privilege, not a right. > > That having been said, the provocations need to stop from both sides as > I said above. That includes tongue-in-cheek comments that imply > Kamailio defects or fundamental technical or political inferiorities, or > ones that attempt to explain user perceptions of OpenSIPS in an ad > hominem manner by way of some kind of Kamailio affiliation or anything > like that. > > Just don't do it. It's bad for business, it's bad for both products, > it's bad for everyone. NOBODY wins if commercial adopters see this kind > of petty bickering and egotism, especially from lead developers and > other significant stakeholders in the commercial ecosystem. >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
